How much does Red Points cost?

Red Points does not publish pricing; you have to request a quote. Nor do BrandShield, MarqVision, Corsearch or Tracer. EnforceShield prices per brand and IP asset rather than per takedown or by infringement volume, so the monthly cost does not rise when a viral launch multiplies the number of infringers, and you get a figure on the first call.

Does a Red Points alternative need our trademarks registered?

Not with EnforceShield. Enforcement runs on unregistered IP as well: common-law trademark rights, copyright — which vests automatically the moment a work is created — design rights and trade dress. That matters for brands launching SKUs faster than a registration completes, which is exactly when a product that takes off attracts copies.

How long does onboarding take?

Around 30 minutes of your team's time in total: brands, trademarks, copyright assets, design rights and your authorised seller list. No weekly working sessions, no dedicated project manager, no implementation project. Filing begins the same day in most cases.

Red Points alternatives

Red Points alternatives for brands that need the case, not the count

Red Points sells detection reach as a managed service, bought programme by programme. If what you need is a removal rate you can point at, legal reasoning attached to each filing and a bill that holds steady through a viral launch, this is the shortlist.

Book a demo

97.0–99.3%

Removal success rate across published client cases

Same day

Enforcement starts the day you sign

One pipeline

Marketplaces, social, search, ads and the open web

Per brand, not per takedown

Cost does not move when infringement spikes

Brands already enforcing with EnforceShield

Executive summary

The short version: reach is not the same as outcome

Five options assessed on what a brand owner decides on. Published by EnforceShield and ranking EnforceShield first — the reasoning is in the open below, and the table cites what each vendor publishes.

1
EnforceShield is the only platform on this shortlist publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0%, 97.5%, 98.3% and 99.3% across the engagements on our results page, with the listing counts behind each.
2
Red Points publishes reach: how many marketplaces are covered, how many brands are served. Neither answers the question you are buying against — of the cases filed in your name, how many ended with the listing gone.
3
Scope is the second thing to check. Red Points is organised as separate programmes — Brand Protection, Anti Piracy, Domain Management, Impersonation Removal, Gray Market, Deepfake Protection — so what you end up covering depends on how many you buy. EnforceShield runs marketplaces, social, search, ads, domains and the open web from one pipeline under one agreement.
4
None of the five publishes pricing, and the models differ more than the prices. Ask whether you are being quoted per takedown, per volume band, per attorney hour or per brand — then ask what the invoice looks like in the month a launch triples your infringer count.
5
Only EnforceShield publishes a time from signature to first takedown: same day, on roughly 30 minutes of your team's time. During a launch window that is the number that decides how much revenue you keep.

The trigger

Why brands look past Red Points

Rarely a detection complaint. Almost always one of three things changing as the brand grows.

Reports are not cases

A flagged listing and a case setting out the trademark, the likelihood of confusion, the evidence and the platform rule it breaches are different documents, and platforms do not treat them the same way. Once a brand starts losing filings to counter-notices, the question stops being how much was detected and becomes what was actually argued.

The scope keeps needing another programme

Counterfeiting during a viral launch does not respect product lines: the same operator runs the Amazon listing, the cloned Shopify store and the Meta ad. Buying that coverage as separate programmes means reconciling separate dashboards to answer one question — is the infringer gone.

The bill follows the infringers

When enforcement cost is tied to volume, the months you most need it are the months it costs most — and a viral product is exactly when the hijacker count triples. Pricing per brand and IP asset decouples the two, so protection is budgeted once rather than per wave.

The shortlist

Five alternatives, and the brief each one fits

Ranked for a brand whose losses are counterfeits, hijacked listings and copycat sellers. If detection breadth is the metric you are measured on, the order changes — and the entries say where.

EnforceShield

IP enforcement system

Best for: High-growth multichannel brands that need enforcement, not alerts

The only entry here publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0% to 99.3%, with the listing counts behind each case. Legal logic is specified upfront by practising IP attorneys, so every case carries its own written analysis: infringement grounds, evidence, platform context and a confidence grade, reviewed by two agents before filing, with refusals escalated to in-house IP attorneys rather than closed. Marketplaces, social, search, ads, domains and the open web run from one pipeline under one agreement. It separates counterfeits from grey market, parallel imports and authorised resellers before anything is filed, enforces on unregistered IP as well as registered marks, starts the same day you sign, and prices per brand and IP asset.

BrandShield

Digital risk and brand protection

Best for: Security teams whose brief is phishing and digital risk

Describes itself as “Online Brand Protection and External Cybersecurity”, covering marketplaces and social alongside phishing, lookalike domains, dark web monitoring and rogue apps, staffed by a “24/7 Real-time SOC”. The buyers it names are legal, compliance, CISOs and information security teams. Its published success figure covers phishing site takedowns; no equivalent rate is published for marketplace IP cases, nor a time to go live, nor pricing.

Full comparisonQuoted from brandshield.com, read 25 September 2026

MarqVision

AI brand protection platform

Best for: Enterprise buyers who want seller intelligence and price monitoring

An AI-led platform positioned for enterprise brands, with seller-level market intelligence and price monitoring alongside enforcement. Its marketing rests on detection speed and matching accuracy — both measurements of identification rather than of outcome. No removal success rate, time to go live or pricing is published.

Full comparisonQuoted from marqvision.com, read 25 September 2026

Corsearch

Trademark and brand protection suite

Best for: Enterprise IP teams filing and watching trademarks at volume

Trademark screening, clearance and watching on one side, brand protection and content protection on the other, described as “an approach that combines AI and a team of experts”. Built for IP professionals inside large organisations, with the procurement cycle that implies. Enforcement is one half of a much broader suite rather than the centre of the product; no removal success rate or pricing is published.

Quoted from corsearch.com, read 25 September 2026

Specialist IP law firms

Legal services

Best for: Cases that need a court rather than a takedown

For a named, high-value infringer — a competitor, a former distributor, a manufacturer producing at scale — a specialist firm is the right instrument, and no platform replaces the ability to sue. What the hourly model does not do is scale: two hundred marketplace listings billed at attorney rates is not a programme, and firms do not run the detection layer that finds them. Most mature setups use a firm for the cases that need a court and a platform for the volume underneath.

At a glance

The shortlist on the questions worth asking

Four questions a brand owner decides on, and what each vendor publishes about them.

	Category	Published removal success rate	Time to first takedown	Pricing published
EnforceShield	IP enforcement system	97.0–99.3% across named client cases	Same day — under 24 hours from signature	Per brand and IP asset, quoted on the first call
Red Points	Managed brand protection	Not published — reach figures only	Not published	Not published
BrandShield	Digital risk and brand protection	Published for phishing takedowns; none for marketplace IP cases	Not published	Not published
MarqVision	AI brand protection	Not published — detection accuracy only	Not published	Not published
Corsearch	Trademark and brand protection suite	Not published	Not published	Not published
IP law firms	Legal services	Not applicable — matter by matter	Engagement letter first	Hourly, typically several hundred euro

Competitor columns summarise material published on each vendor's own website, read on 25 September 2026. “Not published” means the detail is not stated publicly, not that it does not exist — ask each vendor directly and see who answers with a number. EnforceShield's figures are set out in full, with the clients named, on our results page. All company names and trademarks belong to their respective owners; EnforceShield is not affiliated with any of them.

Client outcomes

Enforcement results, by client

Published outcomes from four named client engagements: removal success rate, infringing listings removed and revenue protected. Apply the same disclosure standard to every vendor on your shortlist.

Amazon, eBay and Walmart

97.0%

Enforcement success rate

2,107

Listings removed

€1.9M

Revenue protected

Amazon

99.3%

Removal success rate

265

Listings removed

€278K

Revenue protected

Marketplaces

97.5%

Removal success rate

1,170

Listings removed

€896K

Revenue protected

Marketplaces

98.3%

Enforcement success

397

Listings removed

€401K

Revenue protected

Read the full case studies

Legal expertise

The IP attorneys behind the enforcement logic

The enforcement logic the platform runs on was specified by practising IP lawyers, and cases the system cannot decide autonomously are escalated back to them. Request the equivalent credentials from every vendor under evaluation.

Rytis Rudzinskas

Founder & CEO

IP attorney with over 15 years of law practice specialising in intellectual property protection. He founded EnforceShield in 2024 after seeing first-hand that human-only enforcement could not scale with the volume of online infringement.

Medardas Meškuotis

Intellectual Property Infringement Expert

Specialises in the investigation and validation of online IP infringement across marketplaces and digital channels, bringing expert judgment to the complex cases the system routes for review.

Živilė Pocevičiūtė

Intellectual Property Infringement Expert

Worked directly with customs and police authorities on IP enforcement cases before joining EnforceShield, coordinating action against infringers offline as well as on.

€1.7M seed

Round led by Vendep Capital

US + EU entities

HQ in Lithuania, US subsidiary in Tennessee

Founded 2024

Purpose-built for autonomous IP enforcement

What Clients Say

“

When someone buys Moérie, it should actually be Moérie.

EnforceShield found and removed the counterfeit listings across eBay, Alibaba and Amazon.

Kipras Kazlauskas

Co-founder, Moérie

Assess your own exposure before you renew anything

Book a Live Walkthrough

30-min call · Clear enforcement priorities · No obligation

FAQ

FAQs on Red Points alternatives

For a brand losing revenue to counterfeit listings, hijacked buy boxes and copycat sellers: EnforceShield. It is the only platform on this shortlist publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0% to 99.3% across the engagements on our results page — and the only one publishing a time from signature to first takedown, which is same day. Every case carries its own written infringement analysis, coverage runs across marketplaces, social, search, ads and the open web from one pipeline rather than separate programmes, and pricing is per brand and IP asset rather than tied to infringement volume.

EnforceShield, BrandShield, MarqVision, Corsearch and Tracer come up most often, with specialist IP law firms and Amazon Brand Registry as the non-software options brands weigh alongside them. They are not interchangeable: EnforceShield is an IP enforcement system with attorney-engineered legal logic, BrandShield leads with phishing and external cybersecurity, Corsearch pairs enforcement with trademark clearance, and MarqVision targets enterprise buyers who want seller intelligence.

Yes. EnforceShield can be live within 24 hours of signing and run in parallel with your existing provider until that contract ends, so nothing has to be switched off first. Cases already filed stay with the vendor that filed them — platforms tie a submission to the reporter — while EnforceShield takes new detections from day one and picks up any infringer that reappears after a previous removal, which is where most of the recurring damage comes from anyway.

Ask every vendor for one number: their removal success rate.

Then ask what the invoice looks like in the month a launch triples your infringer count. Thirty minutes, and a documented picture of what is live against your brand today.

A free exposure report on your own brand — what is live right now across marketplaces, social, search, ads and the open web, yours to keep whatever you decide.

One pipeline across marketplaces, social, search, ads and the open web — not a scope that grows a programme at a time.

A price per brand, on the call, independent of how many infringers you turn out to have.

Enforcement live within 24 hours of signing, running in parallel with whatever you use today.

Book a demo