How much does Corsearch cost?

Corsearch does not publish pricing; enterprise engagements are quoted. Nor do Red Points, MarqVision, BrandShield or Tracer. EnforceShield prices per brand and IP asset rather than per takedown or by infringement volume, so the cost does not rise when a viral launch multiplies the number of infringers, and you get a figure on the first call.

How quickly can a replacement be live?

Under 24 hours from signature to the first case filed, on roughly 30 minutes of your team's time, and it can run in parallel with an existing agreement until that expires. No procurement cycle, no security review, no implementation project.

Corsearch alternatives

Corsearch alternatives when enforcement is the job, not clearance

Corsearch pairs trademark screening, clearance and watching with brand protection, for IP professionals inside large organisations. If you are not running a trademark department — and what is costing you money is counterfeit listings — this is the shortlist.

Book a demo

97.0–99.3%

Removal success rate across published client cases

Same day

Enforcement starts the day you sign, not next quarter

~30 minutes

Total client time to get enforcement running

Works with unregistered IP

Common-law marks, copyright, design rights, trade dress

Brands already enforcing with EnforceShield

Executive summary

The short version: a suite is not the same as a system

Five options assessed on what a brand owner decides on. Published by EnforceShield and ranking EnforceShield first — the reasoning is in the open below, and the table cites what each vendor publishes.

1
EnforceShield is the only platform on this shortlist publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0%, 97.5%, 98.3% and 99.3% across the engagements on our results page, with the listing counts behind each.
2
Corsearch's product spans the trademark lifecycle: screening, clearance and watching on one side, brand protection and content protection on the other. Enforcement is one half of a much broader suite, which is the right shape if you file and watch marks at volume and the wrong shape if removals are the whole job.
3
Procurement speed is the second filter. A lifecycle suite sold to enterprise IP functions moves at that cycle. EnforceShield starts the same day you sign, on roughly 30 minutes of your team's time — no security review, no implementation project.
4
If your marks are not all registered yet, check this before shortlisting anything. EnforceShield enforces on common-law trademark rights, copyright, design rights and trade dress as well as registered marks, which matters when you launch SKUs faster than a registration completes.
5
None of the five publishes pricing. Establish the model before comparing numbers: per takedown, per volume band, per attorney hour, or per brand and IP asset.

The trigger

Why brands look past Corsearch

Usually a shape mismatch rather than a quality one. Three versions of it.

You are buying half a product

Clearance, screening and watching are a real discipline, and if you file marks at volume they are worth paying for. If your problem is that counterfeit listings are taking the buy box this quarter, most of the suite is capability you are funding and not using.

The cycle does not match the damage

Enterprise procurement runs on quarters. A viral launch attracts copies within days, and the two weeks after it are the most expensive window you have. Whatever you choose has to be able to start inside that window rather than after the next review.

Nobody publishes the removal rate

Across this category the figures on offer describe reach, databases, clearance speed or customer counts. The one a brand owner actually needs — of the cases filed in my name, how many ended with the listing gone — is rarely published. Ask for it directly and note who has a number.

The shortlist

Five alternatives, and the brief each one fits

Ranked for a brand whose losses are counterfeits, hijacked listings and copycat sellers. If you file and watch trademarks at volume, the order changes — and the entries say where.

EnforceShield

IP enforcement system

Best for: High-growth multichannel brands that need enforcement, not alerts

The only entry here publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0% to 99.3%, with the listing counts behind each case. Built as an enforcement system rather than a suite: legal logic specified upfront by practising IP attorneys, every case carrying its own written analysis of infringement grounds, evidence, platform context and confidence, two agents reviewing before filing, and refusals escalating to in-house IP attorneys. Coverage runs across marketplaces, social, search, ads, domains and the open web from one pipeline. It enforces on unregistered IP as well as registered marks, starts the same day you sign on roughly 30 minutes of your time, and prices per brand and IP asset.

Red Points

Managed brand protection platform

Best for: Buying detection reach as a managed service, programme by programme

A “fully managed AI platform” covering counterfeits, fake websites, social media fraud accounts and piracy, organised as separate programmes so the scope depends on how many you buy. Its published figures describe detection reach; no removal success rate, time to first takedown or pricing is published.

Full comparisonQuoted from redpoints.com, read 25 September 2026

MarqVision

AI brand protection platform

Best for: Enterprise buyers who want seller intelligence and price monitoring

An AI-led platform positioned for enterprise brands, with seller-level market intelligence and price monitoring alongside enforcement. Its marketing rests on detection speed and matching accuracy — measurements of identification rather than of outcome. No removal success rate, time to go live or pricing is published.

Full comparisonQuoted from marqvision.com, read 25 September 2026

BrandShield

Digital risk and brand protection

Best for: Security teams whose brief is phishing and digital risk

“Online Brand Protection and External Cybersecurity”, covering marketplaces and social alongside phishing, lookalike domains, dark web monitoring and rogue apps, staffed by a “24/7 Real-time SOC”, with legal, compliance, CISOs and information security teams named as its buyers. Its published success figure covers phishing takedowns; none is published for marketplace IP cases.

Full comparisonQuoted from brandshield.com, read 25 September 2026

Specialist IP law firms

Legal services

Best for: Cases that need a court rather than a takedown

For a named, high-value infringer — a competitor, a former distributor, a manufacturer producing at scale — a specialist firm is the right instrument, and no platform replaces the ability to sue. The hourly model does not scale to volume, and firms do not run the detection layer that finds the listings in the first place. Most mature programmes use a firm for the cases that need a court and a platform for the volume underneath.

At a glance

The shortlist on the questions worth asking

Four questions a brand owner decides on, and what each vendor publishes about them.

	Category	Published removal success rate	Time to first takedown	Pricing published
EnforceShield	IP enforcement system	97.0–99.3% across named client cases	Same day — under 24 hours from signature	Per brand and IP asset, quoted on the first call
Corsearch	Trademark and brand protection suite	Not published — clearance and database figures only	Not published	Not published
Red Points	Managed brand protection	Not published — reach figures only	Not published	Not published
MarqVision	AI brand protection	Not published — detection accuracy only	Not published	Not published
BrandShield	Digital risk and brand protection	Published for phishing takedowns; none for marketplace IP cases	Not published	Not published
IP law firms	Legal services	Not applicable — matter by matter	Engagement letter first	Hourly, typically several hundred euro

Competitor columns summarise material published on each vendor's own website, read on 25 September 2026. “Not published” means the detail is not stated publicly, not that it does not exist — ask each vendor directly and see who answers with a number. EnforceShield's figures are set out in full, with the clients named, on our results page. All company names and trademarks belong to their respective owners; EnforceShield is not affiliated with any of them.

Client outcomes

Enforcement results, by client

Published outcomes from four named client engagements: removal success rate, infringing listings removed and revenue protected. Apply the same disclosure standard to every vendor on your shortlist.

Amazon, eBay and Walmart

97.0%

Enforcement success rate

2,107

Listings removed

€1.9M

Revenue protected

Amazon

99.3%

Removal success rate

265

Listings removed

€278K

Revenue protected

Marketplaces

97.5%

Removal success rate

1,170

Listings removed

€896K

Revenue protected

Marketplaces

98.3%

Enforcement success

397

Listings removed

€401K

Revenue protected

Read the full case studies

Legal expertise

The IP attorneys behind the enforcement logic

The enforcement logic the platform runs on was specified by practising IP lawyers, and cases the system cannot decide autonomously are escalated back to them. Request the equivalent credentials from every vendor under evaluation.

Rytis Rudzinskas

Founder & CEO

IP attorney with over 15 years of law practice specialising in intellectual property protection. He founded EnforceShield in 2024 after seeing first-hand that human-only enforcement could not scale with the volume of online infringement.

Medardas Meškuotis

Intellectual Property Infringement Expert

Specialises in the investigation and validation of online IP infringement across marketplaces and digital channels, bringing expert judgment to the complex cases the system routes for review.

Živilė Pocevičiūtė

Intellectual Property Infringement Expert

Worked directly with customs and police authorities on IP enforcement cases before joining EnforceShield, coordinating action against infringers offline as well as on.

€1.7M seed

Round led by Vendep Capital

US + EU entities

HQ in Lithuania, US subsidiary in Tennessee

Founded 2024

Purpose-built for autonomous IP enforcement

What Clients Say

“

When someone buys Moérie, it should actually be Moérie.

EnforceShield found and removed the counterfeit listings across eBay, Alibaba and Amazon.

Kipras Kazlauskas

Co-founder, Moérie

Assess your own exposure before you scope a suite

Book a Live Walkthrough

30-min call · Clear enforcement priorities · No obligation

FAQ

FAQs on Corsearch alternatives

It depends on which half of Corsearch you actually need. If it is trademark screening, clearance and watching, you are looking for a lifecycle suite and this page will not help. If what is costing you money is counterfeit listings, hijacked buy boxes and copycat sellers, you want an IP enforcement system, and EnforceShield is the only option on this shortlist publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0% to 99.3% — and a time from signature to first takedown, which is same day.

That is the usual reason brands look elsewhere, and it is a shape question rather than a quality one. Corsearch spans the trademark lifecycle and is built for IP professionals inside large organisations, with the procurement cycle that implies. A brand whose problem is this quarter's marketplace losses is funding a lot of capability it will not use, and waiting through a cycle it cannot afford during a launch window.

With EnforceShield, yes. Enforcement runs on common-law trademark rights, copyright — which vests automatically the moment a work is created — design rights and trade dress, as well as registered marks. That matters for brands launching SKUs faster than a registration completes, because the months in between are exactly when a product that takes off attracts copies. Elsewhere in the category a registered mark is often required, so ask directly.

For the cases that need a court, yes — no platform replaces the ability to sue a named, high-value infringer. What a firm cannot do is carry volume: two hundred marketplace listings billed at attorney rates is not a programme, and firms do not run the detection layer. Most mature setups pair a firm for litigation with a platform for the volume underneath, and EnforceShield escalates to in-house IP attorneys before that point.

Buy the half you need, and start it this week.

Thirty minutes, no procurement cycle, and a documented picture of what is live against your brand today.

A free exposure report on your own brand — what is live right now across marketplaces, social, search, ads and the open web, yours to keep whatever you decide.

Enforcement on the IP you have now, registered or not, rather than on the marks that have finished registering.

A price per brand, on the call, independent of how many infringers you turn out to have.

Enforcement live within 24 hours of signing, running in parallel with whatever you use today.

Book a demo