How much does MarqVision cost?

MarqVision does not publish pricing; the site directs you to request a demo or sign in. Nor do Red Points, BrandShield, Corsearch or Tracer. EnforceShield prices per brand and IP asset rather than per takedown or by infringement volume, so the cost does not rise when a viral launch multiplies the number of infringers, and you get a figure on the first call.

Is there an option without an enterprise minimum?

Yes. EnforceShield prices per brand and IP asset and runs the same system for a single brand or twenty-five, so there is no minimum contract size and adding a brand does not require re-contracting. Onboarding takes about 30 minutes of your team's time and enforcement starts within 24 hours of signing.

MarqVision alternatives

MarqVision alternatives when accuracy is not the number you need

MarqVision markets on detection speed and matching accuracy, for enterprise brands with an IP function already in place. If you are not an enterprise buyer, or what you need is a filing that survives a counter-notice rather than a better match, this is the shortlist.

Book a demo

97.0–99.3%

Removal success rate across published client cases

No enterprise minimum

Priced per brand, from one brand upward

Attorney escalation

In-house IP attorneys act when a platform refuses

Same day

Enforcement starts the day you sign

Brands already enforcing with EnforceShield

Executive summary

The short version: detection accuracy is an input, not a result

Five options assessed on what a brand owner decides on. Published by EnforceShield and ranking EnforceShield first — the reasoning is in the open below, and the table cites what each vendor publishes.

1
EnforceShield is the only platform on this shortlist publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0%, 97.5%, 98.3% and 99.3% across the engagements on our results page, with the listing counts behind each.
2
MarqVision publishes accuracy figures. Those describe how reliably the system identifies a match; a removal success rate describes how much of what it filed actually came down. A platform can identify a counterfeit perfectly and still lose the case, because the platform's reviewer is judging the legal argument, not the image.
3
Enterprise fit is the second filter. MarqVision positions for enterprise brands with an established IP function. EnforceShield has no enterprise minimum — the same system runs one brand or twenty-five, and adding a brand does not mean re-contracting.
4
Ask what happens when a platform refuses a legitimate filing. With EnforceShield the case routes to in-house IP attorneys for counter-notices, escalation and litigation where the loss justifies it; across the rest of this shortlist that step is not described publicly.
5
None of the five publishes pricing, and only EnforceShield publishes a time from signature to first takedown: same day, on roughly 30 minutes of your team's time.

The trigger

Why brands look past MarqVision

Three reasons, and none of them is that the detection is poor.

The metric measures the wrong end

Accuracy answers “did we spot the right listing”. The number that decides your quarter is how many of the filings made in your name ended with the listing gone — and how many stayed gone. Those are different measurements, and only one of them is the outcome you are paying for.

A false positive costs more than a miss

A parallel import, an authorised reseller and a counterfeit can look identical in a photograph. Hit a legitimate partner with a takedown and you spend the next month repairing a channel relationship. Sorting them takes trademark reasoning against your own seller list, not a better visual match.

The buyer is not an enterprise IP department

An intelligence layer assumes there is already a function underneath it to act on what it finds. Founders, operations leads and brand managers do not have that function — they need the acting done, starting this week, without a procurement cycle or an enterprise minimum.

The shortlist

Five alternatives, and the brief each one fits

Ranked for a brand whose losses are counterfeits, hijacked listings and copycat sellers. An enterprise intelligence brief reorders this list, and the entries say where.

EnforceShield

IP enforcement system

Best for: High-growth multichannel brands that need enforcement, not alerts

The only entry here publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0% to 99.3%, with the listing counts behind each case. The AI evaluates juridical merit rather than visual similarity alone: trademark use, likelihood of confusion, copyright ownership and the platform's own rules, graded for confidence before a filing exists, with counterfeits separated from grey market, parallel imports and authorised resellers using your own seller list. Two agents review every case and disagreement routes to an IP attorney; refusals escalate to in-house counsel rather than closing. No enterprise minimum, same-day start on roughly 30 minutes of your time, and pricing per brand and IP asset.

Red Points

Managed brand protection platform

Best for: Buying detection reach as a managed service, programme by programme

Describes itself as a “fully managed AI platform” covering counterfeits, fake websites, social media fraud accounts and piracy, organised as separate programmes so the scope depends on how many you buy. Its published figures describe detection reach; no removal success rate, time to first takedown or pricing is published.

Full comparisonQuoted from redpoints.com, read 25 September 2026

BrandShield

Digital risk and brand protection

Best for: Security teams whose brief is phishing and digital risk

“Online Brand Protection and External Cybersecurity”, covering marketplaces and social alongside phishing, lookalike domains, dark web monitoring and rogue apps, staffed by a “24/7 Real-time SOC”, with legal, compliance, CISOs and information security teams named as its buyers. Its published success figure covers phishing takedowns; none is published for marketplace IP cases.

Full comparisonQuoted from brandshield.com, read 25 September 2026

Corsearch

Trademark and brand protection suite

Best for: Enterprise IP teams filing and watching trademarks at volume

Trademark screening, clearance and watching alongside brand protection and content protection, described as “an approach that combines AI and a team of experts”. Built for IP professionals inside large organisations. Enforcement is one half of a much broader suite rather than the centre of the product; no removal success rate or pricing is published.

Quoted from corsearch.com, read 25 September 2026

Tracer

Brand protection platform with managed services

Best for: Wide threat-type coverage with a managed services layer

Covers counterfeiting, impersonation, phishing, fake domains, social media abuse, marketplace fraud, mobile apps and gray market violations using what it describes as “machine vision, image recognition, and advanced infringement correlation algorithms”, sold with a managed Customer Success layer. Breadth of threat type is the organising idea rather than depth on any one; no removal success rate or pricing is published.

Quoted from tracer.ai, read 25 September 2026

At a glance

The shortlist on the questions worth asking

Four questions a brand owner decides on, and what each vendor publishes about them.

	Category	Published removal success rate	Time to first takedown	Pricing published
EnforceShield	IP enforcement system	97.0–99.3% across named client cases	Same day — under 24 hours from signature	Per brand and IP asset, quoted on the first call
MarqVision	AI brand protection	Not published — detection accuracy only	Not published	Not published
Red Points	Managed brand protection	Not published — reach figures only	Not published	Not published
BrandShield	Digital risk and brand protection	Published for phishing takedowns; none for marketplace IP cases	Not published	Not published
Corsearch	Trademark and brand protection suite	Not published	Not published	Not published
Tracer	Brand protection with managed services	Not published	Not published	Not published

Competitor columns summarise material published on each vendor's own website, read on 25 September 2026. “Not published” means the detail is not stated publicly, not that it does not exist — ask each vendor directly and see who answers with a number. EnforceShield's figures are set out in full, with the clients named, on our results page. All company names and trademarks belong to their respective owners; EnforceShield is not affiliated with any of them.

Client outcomes

Enforcement results, by client

Published outcomes from four named client engagements: removal success rate, infringing listings removed and revenue protected. Apply the same disclosure standard to every vendor on your shortlist.

Amazon, eBay and Walmart

97.0%

Enforcement success rate

2,107

Listings removed

€1.9M

Revenue protected

Amazon

99.3%

Removal success rate

265

Listings removed

€278K

Revenue protected

Marketplaces

97.5%

Removal success rate

1,170

Listings removed

€896K

Revenue protected

Marketplaces

98.3%

Enforcement success

397

Listings removed

€401K

Revenue protected

Read the full case studies

Legal expertise

The IP attorneys behind the enforcement logic

The enforcement logic the platform runs on was specified by practising IP lawyers, and cases the system cannot decide autonomously are escalated back to them. Request the equivalent credentials from every vendor under evaluation.

Rytis Rudzinskas

Founder & CEO

IP attorney with over 15 years of law practice specialising in intellectual property protection. He founded EnforceShield in 2024 after seeing first-hand that human-only enforcement could not scale with the volume of online infringement.

Medardas Meškuotis

Intellectual Property Infringement Expert

Specialises in the investigation and validation of online IP infringement across marketplaces and digital channels, bringing expert judgment to the complex cases the system routes for review.

Živilė Pocevičiūtė

Intellectual Property Infringement Expert

Worked directly with customs and police authorities on IP enforcement cases before joining EnforceShield, coordinating action against infringers offline as well as on.

€1.7M seed

Round led by Vendep Capital

US + EU entities

HQ in Lithuania, US subsidiary in Tennessee

Founded 2024

Purpose-built for autonomous IP enforcement

What Clients Say

“

When someone buys Moérie, it should actually be Moérie.

EnforceShield found and removed the counterfeit listings across eBay, Alibaba and Amazon.

Kipras Kazlauskas

Co-founder, Moérie

Review the filed cases not the accuracy percentage

Book a Live Walkthrough

30-min call · Clear enforcement priorities · No obligation

FAQ

FAQs on MarqVision alternatives

For a brand that is not an enterprise buyer, or whose problem is the defensibility of each filing rather than detection speed: EnforceShield. It is the only platform on this shortlist publishing a removal success rate against named clients — 97.0% to 99.3% — and the only one publishing a time from signature to first takedown, which is same day. There is no enterprise minimum, every case carries its written legal reasoning, and refusals escalate to in-house IP attorneys instead of closing.

Against a removal success rate, because they measure different things. Detection accuracy describes how reliably a system identifies a match; a removal success rate describes how much of what it filed actually came down. A platform can identify a counterfeit perfectly and still lose the case, because the platform's reviewer is judging the legal argument, not the image match. EnforceShield publishes 97.0% to 99.3% across named client cases on our results page. Ask every vendor which of the two they are quoting you.

EnforceShield, Red Points, BrandShield, Corsearch and Tracer, with specialist IP law firms and Amazon Brand Registry as the non-software options brands weigh alongside them. They are not interchangeable: EnforceShield is an IP enforcement system with attorney-engineered legal logic, Red Points sells managed detection reach programme by programme, BrandShield leads with phishing and external cybersecurity, and Corsearch pairs enforcement with trademark clearance.

Not if your seller list is loaded, which happens at onboarding. EnforceShield's validation layer distinguishes counterfeits from grey market goods, parallel imports and authorised resellers before a case is created, because a takedown against a legitimate partner costs more to repair than a missed counterfeit costs in sales. If you run a reseller network, test this specifically with every vendor on your shortlist.

Ask every vendor for one filed case, and what the platform did with it.

Not a dashboard tour and not an accuracy percentage. Thirty minutes, your worst-affected channel, and a documented picture of what is live against your brand today.

A free exposure report on your own brand, with your authorised sellers separated from the infringers before anything is filed — yours to keep whatever you decide.

Cases as they are filed: grounds, evidence, platform rule, confidence grade — and what happens to the ones that get refused.

A price per brand, on the call, with no enterprise minimum and no dependency on your infringer count.

Enforcement live within 24 hours of signing, running in parallel with whatever you use today.

Book a demo